Rather than relying on the NHS to make
us better we could reduce our chances of getting ill by living healthier lives.
That would save lives and reduce the strain on the NHS budget. Most of us
already know the basic facts. These are that a
combination of four health behaviours in adults is associated with a 14 year
greater life expectancy. The four important behaviours are: not smoking,
moderate intake of alcohol, physical activity, and consumption of more than 5
servings of fruit and vegetables daily(1).
We
would be healthier and the NHS a lot better off if we behaved differently.
As a King’s Fund report in 2008 argued:
“Individual
responsibility for health and self-care are key themes in recent health policy
documents .... The Wanless review of health care funding (2002) showed that
public engagement with health could help to reduce health care costs. Choosing Health (2004) looked at how
information, services, retailers and marketers could make healthy lifestyles
‘an easier option’ for people. Our
Health, Our Care, Our Say (2006) explored the future of health and social
care based on an assumption of individuals managing their health and health
care. These policies are based on a number of ideas:
- individuals should
take greater responsibility for their health care
- individuals should
adopt healthier behaviours to avoid ill-health in later life
- if
individuals do change their behaviours, the hope is that better health
will reduce future health costs.
For the NHS and health
practitioners working within it the challenge is how to support people to adopt
healthier behaviours and avoid risky ones. Much of the published material on
models of individual behaviour and change is based on theory rather than
practice, and there is little consensus on the elements of successful
intervention. (2)
It seems
that knowing the facts does not seem to make us behave according to them, so in
its 2014 five year plan, NHS England prioritised a change of behaviour:
"The first argument we make in this Forward View is that the future
health of millions of children, the sustainability of the NHS, and the economic
prosperity of Britain all now depend on a radical upgrade in prevention and
public health. .... The NHS will .. back hard-hitting national action on obesity,
smoking, alcohol and other major health risks. We will help develop and support
new workplace incentives to promote employee health and cut sickness-related
unemployment. And we will advocate for stronger public health-related powers
for local government and elected mayors." (3 page 4)
One of the
responsibilities of Public Health England, an agency of the Department of
Health that applies research to public campaigns, is: "supporting the public so they can protect and improve their own health".
(4)
Present and future trends
Work is already well advanced in this direction:
Change4Life (a government sponsored site to
help people change eating, drinking and
activity habits) has led the way
across government in maximising the in-kind revenue from commercial and public
sector partnerships. Over 200 national organisations have collectively provided
£51.5 million of in-kind support to the programme. This level of investment is
increasing year on year as the range of activity increases.
In
addition local authorities, local supporters and the NHS have distributed about
30 million pieces of Change4Life material, thousands of Quit Tools and Kits. They have endorsed and supported ground breaking campaigns such as Be Clear on Cancer
and FAST for local communities. (5)
We can
expect to see locally based campaigns to try to change behaviour, often
supported by web sites and social media. But is it enough just to provide information? Are we providing it in the
right way? Should it be backed up with financial incentives like a ‘sugar tax’? What about coercion, like banning smoking or punishing unhealthy choices, for
example removing benefits from those who don’t take exercise when they clearly
need it?
Choosing Health; Making Healthy Choices Easier
(2004) set
out priorities including: smoking, obesity, diet and nutrition, exercise, drinking, sexual health
and mental health (5a - para 12). It was understood at the time that people
made choices on the basis of information received from many sources, including
the advertising of unhealthy products, so government had to make sure there were effective and trusted sources of information and “the
availability of those options so that people can take up the choices they want
to make.” Actions at the time included “a new service – Health Direct – to
provide easily accessible and confidential information on health choices with
links to existing services... for example, information on diet and nutrition
(provided by the Food Standards Agency) and support for parents (provided by
Sure Start and other agencies).” (6 para 30)
By July 2008 a report was circulated
on the Government Social Research Service (7) to provide “An overview of
behaviour change models and their uses” (8) and it seemed we might be able to learn how to change
public behaviour by understanding it better.
In the same
year, the NHS
Next Stage Review Final Report (9) repeated the same priorities and looked forward to voluntary
partnerships through a Coalition for Better Health, with a set of new voluntary agreements
between the Government, private and third sector organisations on actions to
improve health outcomes. The Coalition was to be based on agreements to
ensure healthier food, to get more people more physically active, and to
encourage companies to invest more in the health of their workforce.
Yet, in 2015 we are still
worrying about the cost of unhealthy choices and arguing about who is
ultimately responsible for our health andhow best to affect the choices that prevent illness.
What have we learned? Funds and the time of NHS
professionals are both limited. If we are to make real change, how can we
prioritise our options to get the best results?
Sources and references